Thursday, January 9, 2014

The Bible is not a great guidebook, nor is Jesus all loving and perfect



The Bible really is not the great guidebook it is made out to be.  One of the most confusing statements is The Golden Rule.  “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”  A person has to sit there and try to figure first, I am going to do unto others, then what that picture is in the head, you have to figure out how you would want others to treat you, then you have to decide to treat others that way!   I always got confused from the start.   
I personally would want a person to make me laugh a whole lot.  So this would mean I should always try to make others laugh; but the truth is, not everyone else has the same personality and some would not appreciate that.  I also am not hilarious, so I would not be able to do unto others as I would wish them to do unto me.  Why didn’t the Bible just say, “Be as nice as you can!” 
But our rules of compassion, altruism, and group thinking come from man before religion, because these rules helped our species to survive.  The earliest words of the Golden Rule, by the way, were written down in approximately 2040 B.C., with many cultures using forms of the Golden Rule in 600 B.C., so this is not a Christian phenomenon.  See:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule.
When I point out that Jesus was violent, most of you will ignore it and say he is Love.  When I point out that a good share of the Bible is violent, you will ignore it and say that you are “spiritual.”  That is a good thing, because it simply means you are thankful to be alive on this earth and that you are trying to be the best person you can be, to yourself and to others.  But you must realize in all honesty, that you are not following the Christianity of the Bible, You have created a God (using your brain) that is pleasing to you and that asks for rules that you want. 
I never found Jesus likeable, nor do I think he actually lived.  There are too many Gods before that who did the same miracles such as turning water into wine, and these miracles came out of those old myths and also from the Old Testament.  It is obvious that they are taken from the Old Testament, but you should pick up a copy of “Gospel Fictions” by Randel Helms to read in detail how we know they were taken from books of the Bible like “Kings.”  It’s a fantastic book.
Jesus is not a kind, loving, New Testament God or son or both.  He definitely has warring tendencies and has a temperament.  He yelled at his mother “What have I to do with thee?”  when she said that a three day wedding at Cana had run out of wine.  The smart thing would have been for Jesus to provide water, to sober them up, but instead he yelled at his mother and then “miraculously” made more wine (in the same manner as Dionysus years before).  Dionysus was a mythical god too. 
Other nonloving things Jesus did are found in the link I am providing. The website is pink – don’t think it is a virus because of the title and because it is pink when you click on it – it is not, and is quite informative! 
http://www.evilbible.com/what_would_jesus_do.htm

Christopher Hitchens Video on Morality - called "The Best Case Against Christianity"

This is a fantastic video!  Christopher Hitchens was a very brave man - he often seems to be the only atheist in the room, yet everyone was mesmerized by him.



Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Lame Excuses People Use to Continue Eating Meat



Lifelong vegan - Jehina Malik

This blog post may possibly get "fine-tuned" and be submitted to a local online magazine.  It has some parts taken from my "Sermon," but a lot of it is new!

Lame Excuses People Use to Continue Eating Meat


What do you think of when you hear the word “vegan?”  Someone who eats mostly green food, looks like a skinny bohemian, and is no fun to be around?   

I have been vegan for 4 years but I remember what it was like to be a meat eater, since I ate meat and drank milk most of my life.  I can remember what it felt like to think there was nothing wrong with eating meat.  About 20 years ago, I have a memory of my mother handing me a book about animal rights.  The book was probably Peter Singer’s Animal Liberation, but as you can see, I paid so little attention to it I am not even sure of the book.  I kept it for a reasonable amount of time to make it seem like I had read it, and then I gave the book back.  The next Thanksgiving, as I opened my mouth wide to cram it with a huge fork full of turkey meat, I caught sight of my mother glaring at me.  It was so out of character for her that the image has stuck in my memory for life.  I guess it was that important to her, and I just wish she could have known that I became a vegan.  It would have made her proud, but she died nine years ago. 

Nowadays, I try to educate people about what is going on in factory farms and fur farms.  I usually ask people simply to cut down on meat and dairy, and sometimes, after hearing their myriad defenses, I just beg them to drink a glass of juice instead of milk for one meal.  It seems to be way too much to ask.  I always wonder then, whether the words “sacrifice for others” is ever put into practice, or is it something that is just talked about in churches and claimed but never done.

I plead for people to watch a few factory farm videos, but my pleas are met with refusal.  “Oh, I just can’t watch them; they’re too horrible!”  Well, if they know it is so horrible then why do they continue eating meat and drinking milk?

Since my pleas have been met with so many defenses, I thought I would list them, and my responses, so that perhaps the conversation can move beyond giving these defenses again and again.

1.  “We are carnivores. See, right here on the side – this pointier tooth?  This proves we are carnivores!” (Also “We are omnivores.”)
Actually, there is more evidence that we should be herbivore.  But it really doesn’t matter whether we are supposed to be carnivore, omnivore or herbivore.  We have a huge choice in what we eat and if we know we cause suffering, pain and sadness to animals, then we should make a choice to eat something else.  By the way, hippopotami, camels, and gorillas have huge canine teeth and they are vegan except for when they are stressed, so it doesn’t matter whether your teeth look like Dracula, you can be vegan.

2.  “I am a predator.”
My favorite defense is seeing a person who sits at a computer all day and then goes home and sits and watches T.V. telling me he is a predator and is comfortable with his status in the animal world. 

3.  “Plants have feelings too!  You’re killing plants!” 
The answer to this is obvious to any thinking person and any non-thinking plant.  Plants have no brain, no spinal cord, no highly evolved nervous system; in fact, no nervous system.  Which emits less pain, cutting a cow’s throat or cutting a blade of grass which grows back?  

4.  “I would rather help starving children than animals; I think helping humans is more important.”   Look into your heart, and then ask yourself this:  Why is this an either/or statement?  Why only help humans when you can help both humans and animals?  If you really want to help humans, then go vegan, because we can use all this cropland that is currently for animal consumption and grow food crops for human consumption instead.  The environment will be better off, and if everyone were vegan, we could feed the world.  (Once I tell people that being vegan helps humans, they seem to no longer care about helping humans.)

5.  “The farmers will suffer.”
It is sad that we would put the livelihood of farmers over the suffering of animals.  Truly, many farmers want to get out of the factory farm business and hate the toxic ammonia in the barns, but as long as people eat meat and dairy, they have a lucrative business they feel they can’t move away from.  Changing this country to a vegan diet will not happen overnight, so the farmers will have plenty of time (perhaps several generations) to learn how to grow other crops.  

5.  “Animals are here for our use.” 
The last time I checked, humans are not here for another animal’s use.  Take the mountain lion who would love to make us his meal.  Is our only purpose in life to be eaten by a mountain lion?  It seems to be more our purpose to avoid being eaten!  If animals can live to reproduce, it keeps the species going, which can be seen as a purpose, but for humans, our purpose is to fulfill our lives, so an animal’s purpose is not to be food for us. They are here to live. When I read or see videos of foxes being electrocuted anally, baby chicks being ground up alive, baby cows taken away from their mothers and the mother’s milk given to humans with the baby cows never getting a drop of their mother’s milk, and chickens squished eight to a cage with cages stacked on top of each other so their urine and feces drops on those below, I cannot agree that “animals are here for our use.”  This is not as nature intended!  I think the animals are here to live their lives with minimum interference from us, unless we help to make their hard lives better for them.

6.  “The Bible says we have dominion over animals.” 
Humans have used this word, dominion, to mean they have the right to treat animals any way they want, and usually it means poorly.  Dominion means being the caregiver and ruler, but that does not mean being abusive. We have dominion over our children; but none of us would ever force feed our children, operate on them without anesthesia, or send them to stand in the slaughter line.  If we would not do this to a human, why would we do it to an animal? 

7.  “It is the way of the world.”
This is probably the hardest excuse to overcome, because people really believe they are stuck in one culture and one way of eating and that the world must be this way.  They resign themselves into accepting violence against animals, because they think it is necessary for the world.  In fact, with animals as circus entertainment, bullfights, horse racing, dog racing and other ring entertainment involving animals, I am not sure we have come very far from gladiators fighting lions in the Coliseum.  If we did not eat animals, it would not be the “way of the world” for humans.  It’s that simple.

8.  “I only buy humane meat.”
With a few exceptions, I have found this to be a bluff.  Most people do not buy humane meat all the time and they never eat humane meat out at restaurants.  People who claim they eat humane but do not research humane meat farms do not realize that even recently certified humane meat farms contain abuse.  Any male calf born to a mother cow will be taken away and made to become a veal calf, or sold or killed if they are extra.  Chickens in most cage free farms have had their beaks painfully burned to a shorter length and might not even be allowed out of doors.  All breeders have been artificially inseminated, and no one addresses what happens to the male chicks.  Allow me: At one day of age, the male chicks on most factory farms, humane farms and organic farms are either ground up or thrown into a bin to be crushed by the weight of other male chicks.  The egg laying industry does not need male chicks and these chicks aren’t worth raising because they were not bred to be meat chickens.  We have not even talked about the breeding farms that artificially inseminate the chickens that will become the egg laying chickens on factory farms and on many mom and pop farms.  Still think there is such a thing as humane meat?

9.  “We need meat.”
I find this so sad.  Just look at long-term vegans such as Robert Cheeke, Torre Washington, life-time vegan Jehina Malik, and 160 mile World Champion extreme runner Scott Jurek. (Go ahead – Google them please!)  My own total cholesterol is 120, I am 57 years old and I am the same height and weight as in high school, 5”4 ½” and 115 so I really think we can disprove the “We need meat” statement without even bringing up scientific studies and statistics.  I do eat some vegan chocolate (Ghiradelli semi-sweet chocolate chips) every day and usually a little Tofutti sour cream!  I eat breakfast, snack, lunch, snack, dinner, and then cereal before bed, so never think a vegan suffers!
Scientific research shows that saturated fat and cholesterol clog arteries.  X-rays show that giving up meat and dairy and adopting a low fat plant and starch based diet can re-open those arteries. The x-rays results are amazing.
We know that nitrates in meat can cause Cancer, that a recent sampling of chicken in grocery stores showed 85% of the chicken to have feces on them, that girls are hitting puberty earlier with a meat and dairy diet which will cause them to have more of a chance of breast and ovarian Cancers and rob them of childhood, that three year olds have striations of fat on their arteries from the typical high fat, high protein American diet, and that Type II diabetes can be cured on a low fat starch and plant based diet.  Meat is a very dangerous food.  It floors me that people are not eager to ditch meat and dairy, but I don’t think they know how to cook anything else, and they would rather look up another diet that allows meat and is similar to what they are already eating.    

“It is my personal choice!”
Finally, people who want to continue eating meat and dairy claim it is their personal choice and they have a right to eat what they want, and that is technically true because there are very few laws to protect animals.  But this personal choice has victims.  Is an animal’s life less worthy than a few seconds of taste? 

I look at what I used to eat – gooey glue-like cheese, skim milk that looked like it had a tinge of urine and tasted like it too, and meat that had slimy lines of fat in between the grains of meat; and can’t even imagine eating that food. 

I would say, just try it.  Try some soy milk or almond milk.  Go on sites like “vegweb.com; findingvegan.com and veganmotherhubbard.com.  There are so many great sites for vegan recipes! Also, check out “I Can’t Believe It’s Vegan” to find out what is already vegan in your grocery stores.  http://www.vegfamily.com/lists/its-vegan.htm.  Contact a local Vegetarian Society and maybe attend a meeting.  The pot-luck meals are wonderful for discovering new recipes.  Eat more starch, and more fruits and vegetables and that will push meat out of the diet.

There will probably be comments against my article, such as “She’s arrogant, she thinks only her way is right, how dare she tell me what I can or cannot do with my life?”  It’s common.  I speak for the victims in a desperate plea for people to help.  Animals on factory farms have no choice and no voice. We must be their voice.  The strongest compassion can be for those innocent beings we do not see because they are hidden away.  The greatest compassion is when we do not personally get rewarded for it, but do it from our hearts. 

If you eat meat and dairy you are the reason for the enslavement, the torture and the killings.  Immediately, people try to divert from this idea by blaming individual grocery stores, claim they always eat “humane” or just get angry, but it is the truth.  If you eat meat, animals are being tortured and killed for your food.  Most of you have now read my responses, and my guess is that I made sense but will have no influence on your actions or may possibly have a counter reaction. 


Saturday, January 4, 2014

Morals and Positive Attributes of Atheists

I find the statistics in this video to be very helpful.  The entire video is great, but I would like people to pay attention in particular from 18:40 to 28:00.



Friday, January 3, 2014

I really like this meme!  It seems so uncreative to base a meal around one big blob of meat with one color choice. 

Sunday, December 22, 2013

Reading Cereal Labels!



We make changes all the time in our diets when we find out new information.  For instance, to be on the safe side, many people avoid aluminum cookware because all Alzheimers’ patients are found to have excess aluminum in their brains, even though they have not made a positive link to food or cookware.  I easily made the switch to non-aluminum baking powder, which works just as well.  Recently, I also stopped taking vitamins because a buildup of copper, iron and other metals can also accumulate in the brain.)  Now I must work on my choices of cereal to consume, and this is turning out to be more of a challenge!

I used to eat any vegan cereal including Reece’s Puffs and Life.  Then I became concerned about the hydrogenated oil in the cereal, the sugar and especially the BHT.  BHT has been linked very remotely to Cancer, but even remotely is enough for me to want to avoid it.  I loved Life cereal because of the name.  But after I took home two boxes from WalMart that smelled like they had been stored for three years in a mildew filled room, I switched to the generic version, which to my surprise was lower in oil and sugar, and didn’t contain any BHT!  I thought I was all set – until I heard about folic acid.

Folic acid is added into just about every carbohydrate due to the worry that pregnant women were not getting enough folate and that lack could cause birth defects.  Folate is good for you and is found in plants naturally, but folic acid is when they take folate and extract it and then put it back into carbohydrates in concentrated form.  Recent studies suggest it might constrict arteries!  Ugh!  Why did they have to add folic acid to my favorite food!

I started combing the cereal aisle, reading labels, and found cereals with 100% folic acid like boring Bran Flakes!  That’s not good!  What about Shredded Wheat?  60% folic acid!  Any cereal I found that was lower in folic acid was higher in sugar and oil!  Only one cereal in all of WalMart was really low in folic acid, 6% , and was also low in sugar.  It also tasted like it was low in everything and was too bland to stand! 

I walked around the cereal aisle in a daze, forgetting what I was looking for on the labels: fat, sugar, BHT, folic acid?  Sigh.  My favorite comfort food had suddenly become difficult.
Was I resigned to eat oatmeal all the time?  I really love my cold cereal – I must search on! 

Continuing over at Kroger I looked at some Mom’s Best Cereals, the Toasted Wheatfuls, the Safari Cocoa Crunch and the Toasted Cinnamon Squares.  None of them have any folic acid added!  I also bought Golden Grahams because it has 25% folic acid and I figured I could mix it with the Mom’s Best cereals and still have a lower folic acid count.  But I forgot about the BHT!  Golden Grahams will be off the list as soon as I finish the box.  So about those yummy sounding Safari Cocoa Crunch and Toasted Cinnamon Squares cereals: one has 6% saturated fat, and the other 5% total fat.  It’s a toss up whether I was doing better way back at the beginning with the generic Life cereal called Crunchy Oat Squares with 60% folic acid, because it was low in fat and sugar.  Maybe if I just combine it with the Mom’s Best Toasted Wheatfuls for a treat, and do some cereal rotations with cereals at 25% folic acid combined with the Wheatfuls.  Oh, this is too much like Chemistry!   

Now to check my crackers and breads.  Here we go again!



Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Is the Wall of Separation of Church and State Permeable?



If you hear the word “wall” do you think of it as a solid separation or something you can go through?  Recently, an editor (and owner) of a local newspaper claimed that Americans are taking this “wall of separation” thing too far. 
I have to wonder what he thinks a wall is!  And how can keeping church and state separate be taken too far?  

The editor talked about how he thought prayer was appropriate for government meetings and that he would always say “In Jesus name we pray, Amen” even when he was asked to be more inclusive.  I doubt he would agree if meetings he attended always had a Muslim prayer.  Anyway, here is the response I wrote in the Letter to the Editor section.  I have to commend him for printing what I wrote without editing (even though he did not correct one mistake I made) (I corrected the error in the text below). 
In another local paper, that editor takes out “anything offensive” and not much is left of any of my carefully worded articles!  This is one reason I prefer writing in this tiny paper! 

In case you cannot see the article above, here it is:

RESPONSE:

"It is my opinion that government meetings and any secular meetings should not open with a prayer, as prayers are not secular; and some of us see them as a waste of time.  What if it became a rule to open meetings with a hard rock song?  Some people would love that idea, but for those who do not like hard rock, they would have to sit through it at the start of every meeting, which would take a few minutes of the meeting for something that not everyone appreciates.  It is exactly the same with sitting through a prayer. 
By the way, “nothing fails like prayer.” It does not heal amputees, it does not make sick people well, it does not save people from typhoons or tornadoes, and prayer has not passed any studies or tests as being valid. 
Why do you even want a prayer before council meetings?  Will everyone act barbarically without the prayer?  Will they vote differently than if someone gave a prayer first?  If you feel that people need a prayer in order to conduct a meeting, then it does not say much for Christians absorbing or putting into practice the morals they have been taught their entire lives. 
It also reinforces the fact that atheists as a group are much more moralistic than Christians.  Perhaps it would be wiser to listen to a short speech by an atheist before the meeting, as atheists as a group are more educated and it actually could be beneficial.  Statistically, atheists have fewer divorces, fewer out-of-wedlock pregnancies, fewer abortions and they are among the least likely to be in jail. Perhaps atheists should garner a bit more respect than the clergy who are either deluded or putting one over on the congregation for the sake of revenue. 
This is not a Christian nation.  If a Christian nation were the goal of the founders, that concept would appear in the Constitution.  It does not.  Before, during and after the writing of the Constitution, there were people just like you, pushing to have religion added and criticizing the founding fathers’ decisions.  There was even an amendment proposed to the preamble (that Jefferson said had already been mutilated) to add “Jesus Christ” to it.  That was turned down. 
I find it amusing that you cannot say a prayer to God without mentioning Jesus for the sake of all the various people who may be listening.  That does not sound caring, kind or considerate.  You said that “praying to the Father through Jesus” gives validity to the prayer.  Apparently, you feel that only prayers with the name of Jesus are valid.  Prayers of all other religions, therefore, are not valid; prayers to God are not valid.   Well, as I said before, prayers are not valid.
There would be a simple solution to the prayer situation and you would not have to worry about what name is invoked.  You can pray at home, at church, or even have those from the meeting who want to pray in a group meet at your house before the meeting or after the meeting, and have a prayer for that “group effect.”However, I am sure that the suggestion to pray before one attends a meeting has been brought up before and I am sure Christians will continue to ignore the suggestion, because they would rather inflict their Christian beliefs on everyone."